A5 Post #2: Does an Audience Matter?

The audience is vital to rhetorically ethical discussions because without them, there's really no need to have the discussion in the first place. They watch what happens in this discussion and take sides with one side of an argument. Although, in the case of this sort of academic argument where the goal is to have everyone be a little wiser, the audience doesn't really take sides, but simply manages to learn more about the differences between the various racial and ethnic groups coexisting in the society. There is still a group of people listening who will have various opinions of the speakers and of the issues discussed after any sort of event. In fact, the opinion of the audience often affects the direction of the discussion as a whole.

Along with that, the audience also, with the power of their opinion keeps the discussion intelligent as the people in the discussion want to make sure that the audience is learning from the arguments. The audience makes sure that those involved in the discussion are conversing in a way that doesn't involve attacks on others in the discussion or takes situations out of context. In doing such things, the audience plays a significant role in having rhetorically ethical discussions.

A5 Post #1: Bad Faith Arguments: Rewarded or Punished?

Bad faith arguments are those in which false arguments are supported, despite the fact that the arguments are wrong. In a sense, it's deceiving people who know little about a subject by trying to argue for the wrong side, despite the fact that there is evidence against the incorrect argument. This is completely illogical to do, especially because it causes inefficiency in research teams that they search to support arguments that even they likely know to be false. In our society, these arguments tend to be ridiculed and looked down upon, especially when these arguments are made by politicians or news networks.

Some great of examples of bad faith argumentation come up on Stephen Colbert Show. These arguments tend to come the from the Fox New network and often come with a Republican spin. Some arguments that have come up cam be controversial, but the added humor from the audience and the faces that Colbert manages to pull off help to at least try to pull the viewers to Colbert's side of the argument. For example, Colbert takes the argument by Donald Trump that people should not spend so much money on fighting global warming and makes it seem ridiculous by bringing up all the things Trump himself has purchased with large amounts of money that don't seem to be doing much good to the world. Along with that, Colbert also brings up the fact that Fox News criticized Al Gore's book on climate change because it sold at such a low price and makes the comment that he believes in shooting children because of the enormous amount that the Hunger Games film made. This sarcastic comment tries to show how irrational the argument against Gore's book is and also tries to be humorous at the same time. As can be seen through the comments made by Colbert, bad faith arguments are definitely looked down upon and discouraged in our society.

A4 Post 2: Conventions of Film Noir

Film Noir has many conventions that almost all films tend to follow. From the dark setting to the dark story, the entirety of the genre seems to be about exploring the dark side of urban areas in the United States. Along with that, the films all portray the post-WWII era, so there is an attempt to show the feelings of the soldiers returning from war and the women who have lost their jobs due to this return of soldiers. The main protagonist in these films also tends to have a very ambiguous sense of morale because there really isn't much that they're not willing to do to solve the mystery that is imposed upon them through circumstances created by the directors of the films. Film Noir isn't the most positive genre of movies, but it's very interesting to see how the past is portrayed by these directors from the 90's.

One of the more famous noir films is titled Devil in a Blue Dress. This movie features a black protagonist, which in itself is very nuance as these films tend to have white male protagonists, who is sent on a case to talk to a white woman by the name of Daphne Monet. Throughout the film, there are definitely many dark settings and as the film continues, the story turns dark as the search for a woman changes into a murder mystery. Not only that, but the fact that Ezekiel Rawlins, the main protagonist, is a war veteran definitely taps into the idea that this film is also trying to portray life during the post-war period. For the most part, this films seems to really follow the traditions that previous noir films set for this genre.

The exception to this adherence to tradition is the ending of the film. For the most part, noir films tend to have a very sad and depressing ending, often resulting from spontaneous, unexpected, unwanted conclusions to conflicts set up in the film. Devil in a Blue Dress has an ending that contrasts with this image greatly, the film has Easy Rawlins just talking about his coping and forgetting of the events that had occurred throughout the film. Along with that, the setting at the end is happier than other noir films and supports the idea of family a great deal more.

If there's one thing that Devil in a Blue Dress portrayed properly about the 1940's, it's that there was a "color line" that couldn't be crossed by almost anybody. This relates a great deal to our AMST course because it shows what happens when ethnic difference is not tolerated. Even the rich men in the film feared crossing the color line, which caused the main woman in the film to be rejected by the man running for office: her Creole background caused fear in the politician. It makes sense that there was a sense of fear because there were actually numerous laws that prohibited miscegenation, so being caught would mean immediately being out of the race for he politician, but the fact that these laws existed and caused a politician, who is important and nearly famous, to fear crossing it.

Social Issue Speaker Series: Andrew McGuire

Listening to Andrew McGuire as part of the Speaker Series at USC was a very interesting experience. He has truly been through quite the experience as he has fought to change the world and make an impact. From making pajamas safer for kids to self-extinguishing cigarettes, he really took the initiative in any issue that he felt was important. To be able to hear from a man who has been so influential throughout his lifetime is incredible and helpful for any future endeavors to make change in the United States.

There were many important lessons to be learned from this speaker, but at the time time, none of them seemed to apply to Writing 140 or the AMST 274 class. For example, he talked about how the main points of advocacy were to walk honestly and ethically. While it is important to follow such guidelines, that really has no relation to film, race, or ethnicity. Another main point was that we would have to outwork and out-think the opposition, which could possibly apply to the effort to reach a state where the United States can have an ethnically diverse community and still be unified as a country, but it's a bit of a stretch.

Overall, this speaker was nice to listen to, as his explanation of advocacy and his story were informative. His advice through the presentation was useful as well.

A4 Blog Post #1: Article Works Cited Review

In Erenberg’s book, Swingin’the Dream: Big Band Jazz and the Rebirth of American Culture, he explained that both African Americans and White Americans had the same end goals for life. They wished to have “freedom,” “hope,” and “participation,” but the experience that the two groups had were actually very different. African Americans, in their attempt to reach these goals, created bands and played a new form of music to try and gain respect and authority. Unfortunately, things didn’t exactly turn out exactly as expected and, as the author tried to explain in an optimistic manner, African Americans actually never got the respect, the publicity, or even the financial means to continue playing their music for long.

I learned from this book that African Americans were really treated poorly in the time period that Noir film portrays. As a result, the films produced tended to show unfavorable treatment of the African American people, which is rather unfortunate, but accurate. Along with that, the music played in the clubs in these films were usually jazz, which is ironic due to the lack of publicity these musicians would usually get in the time that they were originally played. As interesting of a genre as Noir is, the fact that the accuracy of the times had to portray such discriminatory treatment of African Americans in the cities is rather unfortunate.